<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Wants You To Vote Democrat In 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Another point of view</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Wow, I hadn't heard Yahoo was into censorship.  It's scary, but makes sense at the same time.  What a world we live in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I hadn&#039;t heard Yahoo was into censorship.  It&#039;s scary, but makes sense at the same time.  What a world we live in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth in Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth in Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>If you have EVER had dealings with Yahoo, especially back in the days when they had message boards for each news story, you'd have a different story to tell.  They HEAVILY slanted towards the conservative stories, the conservative posters, and routinely censored progressive posts.

Maybe the reason why the Republiturds in your picture aren't smiling is because they don't have anything to smile ABOUT.  They're still so stunned that people have FINALLY woken up to the evil that the Republican Party represents, that they couldn't force a smile if they were getting sex in an airport restroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have EVER had dealings with Yahoo, especially back in the days when they had message boards for each news story, you&#039;d have a different story to tell.  They HEAVILY slanted towards the conservative stories, the conservative posters, and routinely censored progressive posts.</p>
<p>Maybe the reason why the Republiturds in your picture aren&#039;t smiling is because they don&#039;t have anything to smile ABOUT.  They&#039;re still so stunned that people have FINALLY woken up to the evil that the Republican Party represents, that they couldn&#039;t force a smile if they were getting sex in an airport restroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I'll bet!  I wonder how the picture choices came about?  My first guess was that the effect had been intentional, but perhaps there is some other reason.  Did someone say, "Well, the public hasn't been very supportive of Republicans since all those scandals, so lets give the public what they want and show the 'good guys' on top, and smiling victoriously"?

Or maybe someone was subconsciously biased and never even realized they had created a rift in facial expressions.

Or maybe a robot did it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll bet!  I wonder how the picture choices came about?  My first guess was that the effect had been intentional, but perhaps there is some other reason.  Did someone say, &#034;Well, the public hasn&#039;t been very supportive of Republicans since all those scandals, so lets give the public what they want and show the &#039;good guys&#039; on top, and smiling victoriously&#034;?</p>
<p>Or maybe someone was subconsciously biased and never even realized they had created a rift in facial expressions.</p>
<p>Or maybe a robot did it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Ha! Fantastic catch. I would never have noticed that. There is a big psychological reason behind showing smiling faces vs. non-smiling. I'm sure subconsciously, Yahoo has changed quite a few votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Fantastic catch. I would never have noticed that. There is a big psychological reason behind showing smiling faces vs. non-smiling. I&#039;m sure subconsciously, Yahoo has changed quite a few votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
