<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Wants You To Vote Democrat In 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Another point of view</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:23:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Wow, I hadn&#039;t heard Yahoo was into censorship.  It&#039;s scary, but makes sense at the same time.  What a world we live in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I hadn&#039;t heard Yahoo was into censorship.  It&#039;s scary, but makes sense at the same time.  What a world we live in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth in Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth in Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>If you have EVER had dealings with Yahoo, especially back in the days when they had message boards for each news story, you&#039;d have a different story to tell.  They HEAVILY slanted towards the conservative stories, the conservative posters, and routinely censored progressive posts.

Maybe the reason why the Republiturds in your picture aren&#039;t smiling is because they don&#039;t have anything to smile ABOUT.  They&#039;re still so stunned that people have FINALLY woken up to the evil that the Republican Party represents, that they couldn&#039;t force a smile if they were getting sex in an airport restroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have EVER had dealings with Yahoo, especially back in the days when they had message boards for each news story, you&#039;d have a different story to tell.  They HEAVILY slanted towards the conservative stories, the conservative posters, and routinely censored progressive posts.</p>
<p>Maybe the reason why the Republiturds in your picture aren&#039;t smiling is because they don&#039;t have anything to smile ABOUT.  They&#039;re still so stunned that people have FINALLY woken up to the evil that the Republican Party represents, that they couldn&#039;t force a smile if they were getting sex in an airport restroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll bet!  I wonder how the picture choices came about?  My first guess was that the effect had been intentional, but perhaps there is some other reason.  Did someone say, &quot;Well, the public hasn&#039;t been very supportive of Republicans since all those scandals, so lets give the public what they want and show the &#039;good guys&#039; on top, and smiling victoriously&quot;?

Or maybe someone was subconsciously biased and never even realized they had created a rift in facial expressions.

Or maybe a robot did it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll bet!  I wonder how the picture choices came about?  My first guess was that the effect had been intentional, but perhaps there is some other reason.  Did someone say, &#034;Well, the public hasn&#039;t been very supportive of Republicans since all those scandals, so lets give the public what they want and show the &#039;good guys&#039; on top, and smiling victoriously&#034;?</p>
<p>Or maybe someone was subconsciously biased and never even realized they had created a rift in facial expressions.</p>
<p>Or maybe a robot did it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/12/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 13:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.misinterpreted.org/2007/12/13/yahoo-wants-you-to-vote-democrat-in-2008/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Ha! Fantastic catch. I would never have noticed that. There is a big psychological reason behind showing smiling faces vs. non-smiling. I&#039;m sure subconsciously, Yahoo has changed quite a few votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! Fantastic catch. I would never have noticed that. There is a big psychological reason behind showing smiling faces vs. non-smiling. I&#039;m sure subconsciously, Yahoo has changed quite a few votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

